Comparison of lightweight Linux distributions
Comparison of lightweight Linux distributions
Linux distribution with low resource requirements.
No account needed. By playing, you confirm you're 13 or older and agree to the Terms of use.
1 owner
+1 private profile
Category: Empty
- 1 owner
- 1 copy
- 1 pull
- Wishlisted
- 0
- In 0 albums
- On 0 showcases
- Market listings
- 0
First pulled Oct 28, 2026
Not sold on the market yet.
Readers' pathsAug 2026 – Oct 2026
Readers go next to
Share of the 20,000 clicks on its links
Alpine Linux
Linux distribution based on musl and BusyBox.
6.7%
Lubuntu
Linux distribution based on Ubuntu, utilizing the LXQt desktop environment.
5.4%
Xubuntu
Linux distribution based on Ubuntu.
4.3%
Damn Small Linux
Lightweight, desktop-oriented Linux distribution.
4.3%
AntiX
Lightweight systemd free Linux distribution.
4%
CrunchBang Linux
Debian-based Linux distribution.
3.9%
SliTaz
Lightweight Linux distribution.
3.7%
Puppy Linux
Lightweight Linux distribution.
3.7%
Tiny Core Linux
Lightweight Linux distribution.
3.4%
Absolute Linux
Linux distribution.
2.9%
Readers come from
Share of the 4,100 readers arriving from another article
Puppy Linux
Lightweight Linux distribution.
15%
Linux distribution
Operating system based on the Linux kernel.
12%
Tiny Core Linux
Lightweight Linux distribution.
12%
Operating system
Software that manages computer hardware resources.
9%
Q4OS
Lightweight Linux distribution based on Debian.
7%
AntiX
Lightweight systemd free Linux distribution.
6%
Lubuntu
Linux distribution based on Ubuntu, utilizing the LXQt desktop environment.
3.9%
Damn Small Linux
Lightweight, desktop-oriented Linux distribution.
3.5%
Zorin OS
Ubuntu-based Linux distribution.
2.7%
SliTaz
Lightweight Linux distribution.
2.5%